无名小组第四次作业交作业帖，欢迎参加～～
[font=宋体][color=Green][size=18pt]写完整的[/size][/color][/font][color=Indigo][color=Purple][b][size=18pt]issue55[/size][/b][/color][/color][font=宋体][color=Green][size=18pt]，分析ETS的第一篇argu范文和北美的第一篇argu！[/size][/color][/font]My different perspective on the sample Issue task
Exemplary Issue2008, July, 30 21:26-23:28
“In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists – people who can provide broad perspectives.”
Specialists refer to the people who concentrate their time mainly on specific area or certain program without even thinking about changing their directions. They may spend five years or ten years or a life time on the chosen job and it is difficult or impossible for them to change to another job not related to their original profession. Typical specialists are physicists, doctors and nurses, drivers, carpenters, craftsmen, professors and teachers. Unlike specialists, generalists are more outgoing and more flexible in choosing their jobs. They have strong abilities in communication and making decisions, and they are suitable to any different positions related to management or leadership. Typical generalists are company mangers, school masters, government officials and CEOs. Now days, generalists are in great needed while the media often claim the lack of person who not only know how to concentrate on one special area but the other necessary knowledges as well. It seems our society is crowded of specialists walking on the street without rules and orders assigned by generalists. Is that so? I rather doubt it with the following questions.
Is it true that specialists are too many to be special?
Specialists have helped us in many ways throughout history: from giant dams to light bulbs are all the work of specialists. Because of this, the craze on specialists beginning last century has not been diminished till this day. Crowds of specialists truly did a significant progress in helping developing the society. But the questions is do we need more progresses and developments helped by specialists? Do we want the technologies grow faster and more conveniently? Are there so many scientists in different certain areas fully providing the life style we have dreamed so long? If not, we do need more specialists, especially the top specialists.
Why, now days, there is a great need in generalists?
First of all, we have to admite the fact that the number of generalists, compare with specialists, are not enough and they are needed by almost every country and company. This is not easy to explain by such a short paragraph, but I will give you three reasons to demonstrate my persuasive thinking. First, the increasing number of specialists is the main reason for the lack of generalists due to the reason that several specialists must be managed, ruled or led by the generalists. Second, it is even harder to become generalists due to the different situation in different are than to become specialists. For example, a schoolmaster must know one or two subjects before he/she is qualified to be the master, which will cost him/her more time. Thirdly, work in management and leadership is a relative new skill and career compare with the work in special areas some of which has been known for thousands of years.
Then, what we should do due to the current circumstance?
We must increase the member of generalists first to solve the emergent need. We should, in the first place, encourage young people to aim at this splendid high-salary job as well as our school, no matter college or high school, should add this subject to the routine curriculum. Furthermore, for the companies and management administrations, training the exist specialists the needed skill to become generalist is an efficient and cheaper way. Lastly, we should remind the society through newspapers and televisions that what kind of person we need in order to active the powerful strength of citizens.
In the end, I would like to summarize my opinion that both specialists and generalists are in great need, and we should do something to change this situation by informing society the serious need of these people. By doing so, we hopefully will help both the current generation and future generations a better choice in choosing their careers.
My different perspective on the sample Issue task
Exemplary Issue2008, July, 30 21:26-23:28
“In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists – people who can provide broad perspectives.”
Specialists refer to the people who concentrate their time mainly on specific area or certain program without even thinking about changing their directions. They may spend five years or ten years or a life time on the chosen job and it is difficult or impossible for them to change to another job not related to their original profession. Typical specialists are physicists, doctors and nurses, drivers, carpenters, craftsmen, professors and teachers. Unlike specialists, generalists are more outgoing and more flexible in choosing their jobs. They have strong abilities in communication and making decisions, and they are suitable to any different positions related to management or leadership. Typical generalists are company mangers, school masters, government officials and CEOs. Now days, generalists are in great needed while the media often claim the lack of person who not only know how to concentrate on one special area but the other necessary knowledges as well. It seems our society is crowded of specialists walking on the street without rules and orders assigned by generalists. Is that so? I rather doubt it with the following questions.
Is it true that specialists are too many to be special?
Specialists have helped us in many ways throughout history: from giant dams to light bulbs are all the work of specialists. Because of this, the craze on specialists beginning last century has not been diminished till this day. Crowds of specialists truly did a significant progress in helping developing the society. But the questions is do we need more progresses and developments helped by specialists? Do we want the technologies grow faster and more conveniently? Are there so many scientists in different certain areas fully providing the life style we have dreamed so long? If not, we do need more specialists, especially the top specialists.
Why, now days, there is a great need in generalists?
First of all, we have to admite the fact that the number of generalists, compare with specialists, are not enough and they are needed by almost every country and company. This is not easy to explain by such a short paragraph, but I will give you three reasons to demonstrate my persuasive thinking. First, the increasing number of specialists is the main reason for the lack of generalists due to the reason that several specialists must be managed, ruled or led by the generalists. Second, it is even harder to become generalists due to the different situation in different are than to become specialists. For example, a schoolmaster must know one or two subjects before he/she is qualified to be the master, which will cost him/her more time. Thirdly, work in management and leadership is a relative new skill and career compare with the work in special areas some of which has been known for thousands of years.
Then, what we should do due to the current circumstance?
We must increase the member of generalists first to solve the emergent need. We should, in the first place, encourage young people to aim at this splendid high-salary job as well as our school, no matter college or high school, should add this subject to the routine curriculum. Furthermore, for the companies and management administrations, training the exist specialists the needed skill to become generalist is an efficient and cheaper way. Lastly, we should remind the society through newspapers and televisions that what kind of person we need in order to active the powerful strength of citizens.
In the end, I would like to summarize my opinion that both specialists and generalists are in great need, and we should do something to change this situation by informing society the serious need of these people. By doing so, we hopefully will help both the current generation and future generations a better choice in choosing their careers. 交作业。
[[i] 本帖最后由 doceam 于 2008-7-5 17:23 编辑 [/i]] 第三次作业补交在上次的帖子里了，在这里也传一份，大家有时间的话看看吧~
555教育类好难写……
======================
[b]argu分析[/b]
ETS:
层次：按照内容严重性而非题干中的顺序：考场上效果很好但难以实际操作的方式
开头简单概括题干观点，指出如果听信其中的推理则会出现的问题
论证段中分点进行，按照首句（中心句）展开衍生
存在的错误：
1、概念的混淆：预防性和保护性装置的作用，外界因素的影响
2、滑冰者的主客观区别：结合实际情况分析，会选用装置的本身就比较小心
3、数据问题：笼统的数据不能充分反映情况
4、对保护装置的区分：价格不能说明问题
结尾简要总结全文观点
北美
开头首先点明结论及其有关的论据，将论据按点列举出来，这样为接下来的攻击提供更强的提示性
在论证段中，首先按照原文内容顺序攻击了原文存在的推论错误，然后归纳了两个题目中隐含的假设前提
论证段上，每段先点出将要攻击的错误，然后详细展开（提出可能的假设），有的段落会做一个小总结
存在的错误：
1、运动服销量上升和NW销路错误的因果推论：运动服销量增加=对运动感兴趣=对保健产品和其它与健康有关的产品感兴趣。这两段在论证时采取了一退再退的方法，证明运动服的销量和NW的产品可能的销量没有任何关系
2、健康俱乐部的流行和NW销路错误的因果推论：题干没有提供任何关于健康俱乐部流行的详细资料，为作者的假设条件提供便利
3、健康计划可能的作用：因为时间问题而又很大变数
4、攻击假设前提：随着时间流逝爱好不变，竞争者不够有力
结尾段在指出作者不能支持自己的结论之后，提出了如何将此调查变得使人信服的改进型建议。
[[i] 本帖最后由 ginnybee 于 2008-7-6 16:18 编辑 [/i]] [size=5]组长是按什么标准选作业题的呢？issue 55似乎不是高频呢？[/size] [quote]原帖由 [i]emilie5671[/i] 于 2008-7-2 22:20 发表 [url=http://bbs.taisha.org/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=12021945&ptid=1079428][img]http://bbs.taisha.org/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
组长是按什么标准选作业题的呢？issue 55似乎不是高频呢？ [/quote]
我觉得issue55是教育类里比较有代表性的竞争话题！而且我觉得其实这篇不是特别的好写，也可以练练！
而且高频可以留在后面练～～
大家有啥意见可以提啊！因为我是按照我的想法来布置作业的，期待大家一起讨论～～
交作业~~
交作文[[i] 本帖最后由 mosquitolwz 于 2008-7-4 14:25 编辑 [/i]] 先补交个作业！这次作业是刚睡醒了写的，估计可能有点晕，不管怎么样，先交上来吧～～
页:
[1]