发新话题
打印

issue5 超时几分钟

issue5 超时几分钟

TOPIC: ISSUE5 - "A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer."
WORDS:510          TIME: 上午 12:45:00          DATE: 2006-8-7

When it comes to school curriculum, some people may agree that a nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college, while in contrast, other people would argue that a nation should allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer. In my opinion, the case would be better for students of different parts to learn different classes.

The same curriculum to a nation is easy for people to administrate. First, the curriculum could be made by national government, which could lead students to the right way. Second, as a nation study the same thing, the standard should also be equal to different parts of a country. So it is easy to see the quality of education in different parts and how students learn through an examination. Third, colleges could easily know what students have learned in high schools, which is helpful for them to make the curriculum and no need to worry their students ' foundation. In China, there is an exam which is called The Examination to the College, holded every year, and several million people take part in this exam. And this exam is examining the knowledge of national curriculum. Besides that, colleges will admit a student according to his or her grades. Then colleges will make proper classes for them. This exam have been used for several years and is very helpful.

However, different courses in different parts also have many advantages. First, it is helpful for some place to adjust to the local circumstances. For example, though in China exists a national curriculum, students in Shang Hai study differently form other places. As people there learn English better, their English book is much harder than national book. Second, if the whole nation study the same curriculum, it is bad for students in some place to get more knowledge. If students could learn more knowledge and have a better foundation in high school, why should we control them to the limited standard? More knowledge, more better. So to some places, we should let it develop as it wants.

As people of two sides have their own words, we would better consider the case in China. In the past years, people in every province learn the same thing and attend the exam in the same time. And now, except Shang Hai listed above, people in Beijing and several province have their own courses, as their cases are different from other places. What is more, in other places, the curriculum is still the same. Though in colleges, students who come from everywhere in China study the same courses, they could learn more in high schools which is also useful in their college works. So the inlination is allowing schools in different parts of the nation to determine their own academic courses.

In sum, different places have different cases, and various courses might be proper. Though the same curriculum might be helpful, schools in various parts determining the academic courses will be domestic in the future.

开头有点晕,最后拿出托福的开头
结尾有点不知说什么好了
大家帮看看

TOP

发新话题